1. Are they different? 2. Also, in the short explanation it says they trigger on Activation, but in a bulletpoint underneath it says you can also trigger a reaction with movement. How does this work?
3. It says for your Reactionary Activation, you may take a move, or an action. If you decide to take a move, how much movement do you get?
4. Is this sequence correct?: - Berserkers want to go and charge Horse Archers, so they declare their movement
- Horse Archers do not want to get charged, so they declare a Reactionary Activation, and move away
- The Berserkers see the Horse Archers back off, they decide to run into a nearby forest instead, and hold their action.
Is this how it works?
1) Are they different: Sort of. Anything that can be used as an action can be used as a reaction but at a penalty of -1. So casting a spell as a reaction would be a -1 to whatever base stat they use (willpower or Command). 2) The example shows a charge so that's how I have been playing it when it comes to movement. Since just moving into base (a charge) doesn't take an actions then you should still be able to react. 3) It should say a move action. A move action is your base movement. So if your move is 3, you then apply the -1 to the movement and you only move 2. 4) I don't think so. Basically once the Berserkers move into base contact you then get to take a reaction before the Berserkers get to take their (combat) action by falling back. IF it doesn't work that way then its way to easy to exploit charging to force certain units to fall back. Of course those archers could have also just stood and shot as a reaction but then their ranged is at a -1.
So taking the charge example, since we're suppose to know the army list the other player brought you would know what that squad could do, you then decided to do a reactionary movement to get outta range of the charge this would allow you to move -1 and hope get outta range.
Since this interrupts the turn does that mean the chargers can then do something else ?